Diplomaniacs is, simply
put, a work of sheer insanity. It attempts to catch lightning in a
bottle in its heady synthesis of Broadway chutzpah and stream of
consciousness, rapid fire surrealism. Nothing makes sense, nothing is
taken seriously and everyone is fair game for being offended.. Upon
watching the movie, you have to wonder how this sort of stuff ever
got made. Was everyone at RKO drunk on bootleg gin? Did Wheeler and
Woolsey have carte blanche to do whatever whey wanted as long as it
made money? Did the desperate need to be entertained in the height of
the Depression lead to a style of humour that was only intelligible
at that particular time and largely baffling otherwise? There are so
many questions, but I suppose it really all comes down to context.
Context is everything.
It’s always difficult
to untie a film from the social and artistic circumstances of its
creation. Diplomaniacs is no different, as it exists both as an
entertaining comedy in its own right, but additionally as a film that
is difficult to untangle from the context of not only the Depression
but two of its very famous contemporaries: Million Dollar Legs and
Duck Soup. While the purpose of this little assessment is to look at it in
isolation, it would be remiss of me not to make brief mention its
esteemed cinematic bedfellows
All three movies share
a similar plot and a bizarre sense of humour, combined with broad
satire and a number of shared actors and writers to form a trilogy of
sorts. Million Dollar Legs (released by Paramount in July 1932)
starring Jack Oakie and W. C. Fields got the ball rolling in a tale
of a mythical small country that decides to join the 1932 Olympics.
Woven around this story is a satire on international relations told
in a free wheeling surreal manner. Next on the radar is Diplomanics
starring Bert Wheeler and Robert Woolsey (released by RKO in May
1933) and also dealing with international relations, but this time in
the form of a peace conference. The same irreverent sense of humour
is present due to the fact that both films share the same writer in
Joseph Manciewicz. These two movies could be seen as companion pieces
of sorts if not for the very obvious elephant in the room in the
shape of the most famous about diplomatic relations, the Marx
Brothers’ Duck Soup (the last of the bunch, released by Paramount
in November 1933). The most well known, better written and depending on
your tastes, possibly funnier of the three if anything is the most
restrained and coherent (and incidentally produced by Joseph
Manciewicz’s brother Herman)
Much could be written
about the links and shared heritage of the three films but perhaps
that is for another day. To me, all three films do the same things in
subtly (and some not so subtly) different ways, and the success or
otherwise of the results are up to personal preference. However, in
this fight, I’m all for Team Wheeler and Woolsey.
One of the reasons I
like Wheeler and Woolsey so much is due to the haphazard nature of
their comedy. Whereas much has been written of the Marx Brothers’
ability to undermine societal institutions with their unrestrained
anarchy, their best work (though wonderful) always struck me as too
well thought out (or even intellectual) and structured to be truly
anarchic. This is in part due to the endless theatrical touring the
Marx Brothers did to get the routines and concepts of their
theatrical features hammered into shape. The end result is
brilliantly realised but often lacks a certain level of spontaneity.
Rather, it is a measured anarchy they present, and one that would be
diluted as studios got more involved with their creative process.
What sets the Marx Brothers apart from their contemporaries is their
uniform presentation of a rebellious attitude. They are a close knit
and clearly defined band of rebels whose primary purpose is to deflate pompous
authority. Also, their tightly written and perfectly performed
routines meant that they were more consistently entertaining, hitting
the target more often than not.
Now, all of the above
is what makes the Marx Brothers so good. Ironically, I find that it
is the exact opposite that makes the best of Wheeler and Woolsey’s
comedies that tiny bit superior to the Marx Brothers in the anarchy
stakes. Their lack of critical praise, and their looser approach to
structure gives them a hint of danger, a position of real comedy outsiders.
Their movies give the sense of two performers not really caring what
they say or do, not caring who likes them or what the critics think
of them, and this attitude gives flight to some truly absurd, insane,
anarchic and downright offensive material. As with any comedians
working in this manner, the results are somewhat hit or miss, but the
best bits (and some of the worst bits too) are some of the most
gloriously inventive gags your are likely to see, years before
Hellzappopin’ supposedly set the benchmark for surreal, ‘anything
can happen’ screen comedy.
Diplomaniacs is a
perfect example of Wheeler and Woolsey at the height of their powers
and exuding a confidence that leads itself to experimentation and
spontaneity. It’s a film where anything can and usually does
happen, where there are no sacred cows and where the sense of fun and
comic invention is palpable. And most wonderfully of all, not all of
it hits the target but it doesn’t stop them trying one bit. Here, Joseph
Manciewicz’s script works in perfect unison with the boys’
frenetic performances and cocksure delivery. Whereas his script for Million Dollar Legs has political and satirical points to make, here there is none of that subtlety. Everyone is well aware that
what they are doing is not high art, and that no one will be writing
books about their ‘method’, it’s just silly, low brow humour
with its finger on the pulse of Mr and Mrs Average movie goer of
1933.
Of course, the plot of
Diplomanaics is utter nonsense and serves merely as an excuse to link
all manner of skits, songs and routines together under a loose story
about Wheeler and Woolsey going to an international peace conference.
The picture starts with the boys working as barbers on an Indian
reservation (with the gag being, in the first of many racial
stereotypes, that Native Americans don’t grow beards). Despite this
there is some very silly humour involved including a bearded man with
a bird’s nest and a golf ball in his facial growth, and a scalp
that tries to run away rather than being checked for dandruff. The
dialogue flies think and fast with such gems as “Are Indians
foreigners?”, “No, they’re only on our nickels. If they were
foreigners they’d be on our dollars” and the rather risqué
exchange of ”Willie here has scruples” “ No I haven’t, not
since I used witch-hazel”. The Indians here are in full racial
stereotype mode, dancing and whooping and seemingly only able to
communicate with the word “Oompa!”. Luckily their chief turns out
to have been educated at Oxford and though his ear is “not yet
attuned to your American-isms”, he knows enough to offer Wheeler
and Woolsey $2 million to represent his tribe at the Geneva peace
conference. What could possibly go wrong?
Before they go, there
is a song and dance number which ends with Wheeler and Woolsey being
bounced on a carpet so high that they fly off into space. The boys
are also shown a large gorilla in a cage that used to be “the most
beautiful woman in Paris”. The gorilla has a dresser and a chaise
longue in its cage. Why does all of this happen? I have no idea; it’s
just another day at the office.
Before long everyone is
aboard a liner heading to the conference where we meet the villain of
the piece Winkelreid, played with delicious gusto by Louis Calhern
(basically playing the insane brother of the character he plays in
Duck Soup). He hams up the role of diabolical villain in a way that
wouldn’t be out of place in the Batman TV show, complete with a
gang of inept henchmen. First among them is Hugh Herbert as a
Chinaman (obviously), with a distinctly Yiddish twang and Fifi
(played by a smouldering Phyllis Barry), a femme fatal who arrives as
requested on a conveyor belt wrapped in cellophane, ready for action
and “untouched by human hands” (though not for long).
The ocean liner gets
lost at sea and (obviously) ends up in Switzerland where the
villainous gang retreat into ‘The Dead Rat’, the World’s
Toughest Dive where they sit at a table marked ‘Reserved for
Conspiracies’ ("Gentlemen, let’s have a nice secret
conference”). Later, our heroes arrive in Geneva (in full alpine hiker
outfits no less, saying "I wonder if we're in the right city?") and discuss their plan, with the help of a passing dog that
delivers a message from the reservation. In a great parody of the
snooping villain, its revealed that the whole gang of spies are all sitting in a tree
directly above them in full view listening in. Once the counter plan
is hatched, Fifi suggests, “Let’s all neck”.
It’s about this time
that Hugh Herbert’s Chinaman decides to leave, telling Winkelreid,
“You are the ugliest villain I’ve ever worked for”, surely one
of the great put downs in film history. He rows back to China to find
that is dinner is cold because he’s five years late, and in his
absence he has gained a small army of children. Eventually we get to
the conference, and as expected we are treated to more national
stereotypes and the whole thing quickly descends into chaos. The
chairman of the conference, played by a perfectly cast Edgar Kennedy listens to the insanity then does his trademark slow burn until he snaps and opens
fire on the delegates with a machine gun. Everything explodes and the
finale number “No More War” is sung in blackface, because if you
are going to offend people, why not just go the whole way?
The above is just a
brief description of the madness contained within Diplomaniacs short
running time. Between the silly one liners, stupid sight gags, song
and dance numbers and visual and verbal surrealism it never outstays
its welcome and manages to elicit laughs and astonishment in equal
measures.
A great example of the
humour that defines the movie happens before the conference when the
boys have a conversation with the femme fatale Fifi. Woolsey asks
her, “And who might you be my little cauliflower?” She tells him
“I am the most beautiful woman in Paris” to which his reply is
“Well make the most of it my broccoli, you may soon be a gorilla”.
(So that’s why there was a gorilla in a cage!). I also should
mention that this scene is played as all three run laps round some
furniture (“Get in there, you’re eight laps behind”, Fifi is
told before joining in). They finish the conversation and run out the
room, and we cut to them running in formation straight into ‘The
Dead Rat’. I know the scene doesn’t sound like much as described
but it’s difficult to convey she sheer lunacy of the approach taken
to incidental dialogue and action in the film.
In one sense the
absurdity of every situation delivers a disjointed narrative that
constantly reminds you that you are watching a movie, and indeed one
that no one is taking particularly seriously. This in itself often
takes the viewer out of the spell of the film, yet by doing this
Wheeler and Woolsey are attempting to tap into a level spontaneity
that can only rival the electric frisson of a live vaudeville show.
There is a certain tension in watching their performances, which must
have been palpable to contemporary audiences, in that one does not
know what to expect them to do or say next. Compared to the style of
film comedy that was to follow, the freedom that Wheeler and Woolsey
manage to convey is something rarely seen in movie comedy, certainly
after the early 30s. Many try to give that improvised, shambolic look
but very few do it as well as Wheeler and Woolsey. And I mean that as
the very highest of compliments!
All in all,
Diplomaniacs showcases a team on top of the comedy mountain and
brimming with confidence. Sadly, it wouldn’t last too much longer
before the censors and audience tastes spoiled the party. However,
Wheeler and Woolsey’s work of this period deserves to be remembered
and celebrated far more than it has been up to now. They are a comedy team that
consistently present a sense of fun and enthusiasm whilst pushing
boundaries of comedy and indeed taste. Most importantly, their humour
is honest, often baffling yet always surprising and no one else
exemplifies pre code humour in all its unvarnished glory better. The
critical world will always love talking about the complexities of the
Marx Brothers and Duck Soup, or indeed W. C. Fields in Million Dollar
Legs, and that’s fine by me. Whilst the Marx Brothers and Fields
are timeless, Wheeler and Woolsey are freed from such concerns,
living only in the moment. With Diplomaniacs they produced an
outrageous and funny movie that perfectly captures an era and yet
creates a surprisingly modern comic style decades ahead of the curve.
No comments:
Post a Comment